Monday, November 27, 2006

Women's Liberation

The Women's Liberation movement was a bad thing. It has ruined the family home, encouraged murder and given women who do not even pay attention to politics the chance to vote.

Instead of going out to work, women should stay home, raise families and tend to domestic duties. Instead, we find that women are not only not tending to their children, they are killing them.

The right to abortion that the women’s movement brought has meant that there has been a steady increase of murder through out the years.

Abortion is rising each year, and instead of bringing life into the world, women are destroying it. The Department of Health in a statistical report says that abortions have risen by nearly 1% since 2004 and is increasing each year.

Women are having abortions younger and younger and only have children in their 30’s when their career that never really began has ended. They wait until their bodies are old and used to deliver unhealthy children into the world.

The point of a woman is to keep the household in check and bring up her husbands children. World War Two may have rented the women a reason to work outside the household, but that was because the men were fighting to keep the country free for these women.

How do they repay those that lost their lives in the war? By starting their own war, by insisting that they demand ‘equality’.

In 2004, John H. Johnson examined data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and concluded that gender has an important influence on the connection between work hours and increases in the probability of divorce. Women's work hours consistently increase divorce, whereas increases in men's work hours often have no statistical effect. "I also find that the incidence in divorce is far higher in couples where both spouses are working than in couples where only one spouse is employed," Johnson says.

If a host of studies are to be believed, marrying women with careers is a bad thing. If women quit their jobs and stay home with the kids, they will be unhappy (Journal of Marriage and Family, 2003). They will be unhappy if they make more money than men do ( Social Forces, 2006). Men will be unhappy if they make more money than women do ( Journal of Marriage and Family, 2001). Men will be more likely to fall ill ( American Journal of Sociology). Even the house will be dirtier ( Institute for Social Research).

Conventionally, men have tended to do paid work outside the home, and women have tended to do the household work, including raising children.

All of the work must get done by somebody, and the previous combinations of men being the breadwinner and women looking after the house has worked well for centuries.

While women go off to work for a day, trying so hard to compete with a man for his job, her children suffer. Being brought up by strangers, the child becomes more accustomed to a spotty 16 year old girl’s face than the familiar face of the one who brought them into the world.

What is to become of our children if the women of this world selfishly give them up, to go and work fifty hours a week? A recent study in Social Forces, a research journal, found that women--even those with a "feminist" outlook--are happier when their husband is the primary breadwinner.

Women risk their children, their families and marriage all to earn ‘pocket money’ which they spend on cosmetics and clothes designed to ‘liberate’ them, instead of on the future of their children and families.

The only thing that the women’s movement did was create a divide in the family structure, one that is widening with each year as families and children have to suffer for the selfish choices of women evading their duties.

No comments: